A
54-year-old male farmer presented with a 4-week history of left hip pain. He described
spontaneous onset of pain involving his left hip and groin. The pain was aggravated
by ambulation and had worsened progressively over several weeks. The patient noted
particular discomfort with hip flexion when getting on and off his tractor. The
pain occasionally radiated anteriorly to the top of his knee. He denied worsening
of pain with Valsalva maneuver, radiation of pain distal to the knee, and low
back pain. Rest and avoidance of hip flexion briefly reduced the pain. The patient
denied preceding trauma and any associated hypesthesia or paresthesia. He was
a previous smoker, consumed alcohol occasionally, and had never used corticosteroids.
The patient denied systemic signs of illness, weight loss, and nocturnal symptoms.
Over-the-counter medications and complete avoidance of activity provided little
relief.
1. Which
one of the following is the most likely diagnosis based on our patient's history?
a.
Malignancy
b.
Meralgia paresthetica
c.
Avascular necrosis of the hip (AVN)
d.
Polymyalgia rheumatica
e.
L4-5 radiculopathy
Malignancy
is unlikely without associated systemic signs and symptoms, weight loss, or night
pain. Meralgia paresthetica, a localized area of pain described as a burning or
an uncomfortable heightened sensation, is not influenced by direct pressure, hip
movement, or lower back movement, which differs from the presentation in our patient.
Avascular necrosis of the hip has been known by many terms including aseptic necrosis
and osteonecrosis. Various factors leading to AVN have been identified, including
corticosteroids and alcohol. Of the choices provided, AVN is the most likely diagnosis.
Polymyalgia rheumatica is a common disorder that occurs often in persons older
than 50 years. Classically, it presents with subacute onset of symmetrical aching
and morning stiffness involving the shoulders, hip girdles, neck, and torso, symptoms
inconsistent with those of our patient. Lumbar radiculopathy most commonly involves
the L4-5 nerve roots and causes lateral hip pain that radiates down the leg and
into the foot, with or without associated foot numbness. Our patient denies worsening
of pain with Valsalva maneuver, paresthesias, or radiation of pain distal to the
knee; thus, lumbar radiculopathy is an unlikely cause of his symptoms.
Physical
examination revealed normal vital signs. The patient had an antalgic gait without
focal tenderness over the lateral hip or groin. There was no discrepancy in leg
length. The patient had full range of motion of his hips and knees, although abduction
and adduction of the left hip reproduced the pain. The pain was most marked with
flexing, abducting, and externally rotating the patient's leg such that the ankle
of that leg was on top of the opposite knee (fabere or Patrick test). Straight
leg raise did not reproduce his pain or cause radicular symptoms. The patient
had no spinal tenderness or scoliosis. Neurologic evaluation revealed only give-way
weakness of the left hip secondary to pain. Findings on the rest of the examination
were unremarkable.
2.
Which one of the following is the next best step in the treatment of our patient?
a.
Local injection for presumed trochanteric bursitis
b.
Plain radiography of the lumbar spine, hip, and pelvis
c.
Reassurance with no further testing
d.
Bed rest for 1 week followed by physical therapy and strength training
e.
Testing to determine serum protein electrophoresis, erythrocyte sedimentation
rate, prostate-specific antigen level, and complete blood cell count
Inflammation
of the trochanteric bursa, one of the most common causes of hip pain, results
from exaggerated movements of the gluteus médius tendon and the tensor fascia
over the femur. Patients typically experience lateral hip and thigh pain that
worsens with ambulation or direct pressure over the area. Our patient's symptoms
do not correlate with trochanteric bursitis. Plain radiography, the correct choice,
should be considered for all patients with both acute and chronic hip pain to
exclude fracture and to provide information regarding arthritis or lytic lesions
of the femur. Reassurance, bed rest, physical therapy, and further laboratory
testing may be appropriate, but only after obtaining radiographs.
Plain
radiographs of the lumbar spine, hips, and pelvis revealed mild osteopenia of
the femoral neck and head. Results of laboratory studies including serum protein
electrophoresis were normal. Initially, our patient was treated conservatively,
with limited weight bearing and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Despite these measures, 3 weeks later he continued to have pain that limited his
ability to complete his harvest.
3.
Which one of the following is the most appropriate step at this time in our patient's
evaluation?
a.
Continued conservative treatment and initiation of physical therapy
b.
Radionuclide bone scanning
c.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip
d.
Ultrasonography of the hip with needle aspiration if effusion is present
e.
Referral to an orthopedic surgeon for hip replacement
Our
patient's pain has not responded to conservative measures for more than 8 weeks.
The persistence of symptoms warrants further evaluation. Therefore, continued
conservative treatment alone is incorrect. Radionuclide bone scanning usually
is reserved for suspected pathology not revealed by plain radiography when MRI
is not available.
Magnetic
resonance imaging is the radiographie study of choice for evaluation of hip joint
pathology.' Besides allowing early diagnosis and staging of osteonecrosis,MRI
enables the clinician to evaluate for potential infection, tumor, and pathology
within the surrounding tissue. Immediate arthrocentesis is reserved usually for
acute and severe hip pain in patients with findings suggestive of infection. An
imaging technique such as ultrasonography for assistance with aspiration is advised.
However, our patient's case does not warrant aspiration, and given the available
information, there is no indication for surgical intervention.
Magnetic
resonance imaging of our patient's hip with and without gadolinium revealed diffusely
increased T2 signal with partial loss of T1 signal involving the femoral neck
and head. There was moderate soft tissue edema in the adjacent fat, vastus intermedius
muscle, and adductor muscle, with little effusion. Our patient returned to see
his physician the following day.
4.
Based on MRI findings, which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
a.
AVN
b. Bone
marrow edema syndrome (BMES)'/'transient osteoporosis of the hip
c.
Ewing sarcoma
d.
Osteoid osteoma
e.
Adductor tendinitis
Findings
that suggest AVN/osteonecrosis include the pathognomonic double line or crescent
sign (subchondral radiolucency), which represents evidence of subchondral collapse.2
Such findings may be seen on plain radiographs or T2-weighted coronal MRI and
represent a high-intensity rim within a low-intensity margin surrounding necrotic
tissue.3 In our patient, these findings were not seen on MRI. Our patient's findings
of increased T2-weighted signal with corresponding decreased signal intensity
on Tlweighted images are characteristic of BMES and are present early in the disease
course.4 6 Therefore, BMES is the most likely diagnosis. Ewing sarcoma affects
the long bones of the extremities, usually the femur and the pelvis. Patients
typically experience localized pain or swelling for a few weeks or months and
worsening nocturnal pain. Radiographically, the tumor is described as having a
"moth-eaten" appearance. The classic finding of Codman triangle (expansion
of the cortex with a displaced periosteum from the underlying tumor) was absent
in our patient. Osteoid osteomas are benign bone-forming tumors that characteristically
produce nocturnal bone pain relieved by aspirin. This is unique among bone tumors
and absent in our patient. Tenderness over the involved tendon and pain with resisted
adduction of the lower extremity are characteristic of adductor tendinitis and
may reproduce the medial thigh and groin pain of hip disease. However, this disease
does not explain the changes of the femoral head seen in our patient on MRI.
Our
patient's hip pain decreased with continued conservative treatment with NSAIDs
and limited weight bearing, and repeated MRI 10 weeks later revealed improvement
of the edema. The patient returned to his physician 5 months later with similar
pain in his left knee. Because of his history, MRI of the knee was performed,
which revealed patchy edema in the distal femur, in the lateral and medial femoral
condyle, and in the proximal tibia on T2-weighted imaging with fat saturation.
5.
Based on these new findings, which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
a.
Osteoarthritis
b.
Regional migratory osteoporosis
c.
Osteosarcoma
d.
Occult knee fracture
e.
Pseudogout
Our
patient's MRI findings are not consistent with osteoarthritis and suggest this
process is similar to the one identified in his hip. When bone marrow edema involves
more than one joint or moves from one joint to another, it is referred to as regional
migratory osteoporosis, which is a migrating arthralgia of the weight-bearing
joints of the lower limbs. This is the most likely diagnosis, based on the new
findings. Osteosarcomas are uncommon primary malignant tumors of bone and occur
primarily in children and adolescents. In our patient, there was no radiographic
evidence of osteosarcoma.
Although
MRI is the study of choice for occult knee fracture not identified on plain radiography,
in our patient MRI indicated no discrete area of fracture. Furthermore, he had
no findings consistent with pseudogout.
After
4 additional months of taking NSAIDs, our patient's limited weight-bearing activity
slowly advanced through physical therapy, and he had complete resolution of all
symptoms. Our patient is now pain free and has no residual sequelae.
DISCUSSION
Hip
pain is extremely common in adults. Of those older than 60 years, 14% have reported
substantial hip pain on most days.7 There are numerous etiologies for hip pain,
and we describe a potential diagnosis that may be overlooked.
Curtiss
and Kincaid8 first described transient osteoporosis in 1959 after finding an association
between hip pain in the third trimester of pregnancy and radiographic bone demineralization.
Since this original description, the syndrome has been referred to by several
different terms. Transient osteoporosis of the hip is the term credited to Lequesne
from his 1968 report.9 Although this condition is seen classically in the third
trimester of pregnancy, men in their fourth through seventh decades of life account
for more than 60% of reported cases.9-12 The term bone marrow edema syndrome was
introduced to replace transient osteoporosis of the hip and is based on characteristic
MRI findings.4,5,13,14 The joints of the lower extremities are affected much more
frequently than the upper extremities, and symptoms occur most often in the hip
followed by the knee, the foot, and the ankle.10 Bone marrow edema syndrome may
affect the hip or knee as the single joint involved.4,5,11,13,16 Regional migratory
osteoporosis (or migratory BMES17) was described first in 1967 as a migratory
osteolysis, and its etiology remains unknown.18 It is characterized as a migrating
arthralgia of the weight-bearing joints of the lower extremities associated with
a focal osteoporosis. The migration occurs from one articulation to another and
is the feature that separates regional migratory osteoporosis from BMES involving
the hip or knee alone.10,19-21
In
BMES, patients present with progressive, ill-defined unilateral hip pain, usually
described as a deep ache localizing to the medial or anterior thigh without radiation
below the knee. Symptoms present acutely without inciting trauma and often render
patients unable to ambulate without assistance. Pain worsens primarily with activity,
whereas pain on resting, back pain, and neurologic dysfunction are not characteristic
of BMES and suggest an alternative diagnosis.
Physical
examination findings of hip involvement most commonly include guarding during
hip range of motion, especially with abduction or rotation of the hip, and an
antalgic gait. Tenderness over the greater trochanter and adjacent adductor and
hip flexor muscle groups may be present. Provocative tests with a fabere/Patrick
test, resisted straight-leg raise, or hip joint compression or rotation loads
may reproduce the pain. Results of spine and knee examinations and neurologic
examination will be normal.6
Laboratory
tests generally do not help with the diagnosis. Plain radiographic findings obtained
during the first 2 to 4 weeks of symptoms are usually normal. After 4 to 8 weeks
of pain, osteopenia may be evident with a preserved joint space and no osseous
erosion or subchondral collapse.5 After this point, various degrees of cortical
thinning and osteopenia around the intertrochanteric region and femoral head and
neck have been described. This is in contrast to AVN, in which sclerosis progresses
to articular surface flattening and eventual subchondral collapse.22
Computed
tomograms of BMES provide findings similar to those on plain radiographs.11 Radionuclide
bone scans are often positive within the first week of symptoms, revealing homogenously
increased uptake of the area involved.11,12 Magnetic resonance imaging is the
modality of choice to exclude alternative diagnoses while revealing characteristic
findings of bone marrow edema as early as 48 hours after onset of pain.13,23,24
Bone marrow edema identified with use of MRI is 100% sensitive but not specific
for BMES,13,25 which is identified best by a coronal plane section with increased
T2-weighted signal with a corresponding low signal or decreased signal intensity
on T1-weighted images.4,5 Use of gadolinium will result in marked enhancement
without focal changes.26 Also, edema seen with BMES usually is more extensive
than that seen with AVN.5 The bone cortex may appear thinned but intact. Unlike
in AVN, there should be no evidence of subchondral defects.
Avascular
necrosis of the hip is a progressive condition resulting from an interruption
of the vascular supply to the femoral head. The early features of transient osteoporosis/
BMES may be confused with AVN,3 which has fueled debate about whether BMES and
AVN of the femoral head represent the same disease at different ends of a spectrum13
or separate diseases.10,12 Clinically, this distinction is critical because each
diagnosis has substantially different prognostic features, and incorrect diagnosis
may lead to unnecessary surgical referral and potential intervention.
Most
reports suggest that BMES is a self-limited disease. The natural history of this
entity is that of a symptom plateau followed by a gradual resolution of symptoms
over 3 to 9 months. Migratory recurrence of symptoms occurs usually within the
first 2 years after pain relief.10 Treatment includes supportive care, with initiation
of pain management and physical therapy with use of protected weight bearing.
Usually, NSAIDs ameliorate the symptoms sufficiently; however, opioids may be
necessary during the acute setting. Physical therapy to provide gait retraining
and protected weight-bearing techniques allow for easier pain control and increased
function. As symptoms allow, a low-impact strengthening routine should be used,
aimed at flexibility and increased range of motion to prevent deconditioning.
The most feared complications are insufficiency and subcapital fractures of the
femoral neck, which require orthopedic evaluation. For this reason, protected
weight bearing is essential.
One
case report suggested that alendronate may provide significant pain relief and
improve ambulatory function in patients with BMES.27 Much like with the etiology
of BMES, cautious observation vs intervention as treatment of BMES is controversial.
Authors have suggested that surgical core decompression may be used in BMES, especially
in patients with refractory pain despite use of conservative measures."
Bone
marrow edema syndrome is an often-overlooked etiology for acute hip pain both
in pregnant women and in middle-aged men. Conservative treatment is usually sufficient,
but patients may require surgical intervention or alendronate for symptomatic
relief. Correct identification of features consistent with BMES rather than AVN
is critical to avoid unnecessary interventions or delays in therapy in patients
with AVN. Bone marrow edema syndrome should be considered in the differential
diagnosis of middle-aged men and young women with hip pain.
Correct
answers: 1. c, 2. b, 3. c, 4. b, 5.b
| [Reference] |
| REFERENCES |
| 1. Zacher J, Gursche A. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: 'hip'
pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17:71-85. |
| 2. Mazières B. Osteonecrosis. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen
JS, Weinblatt ME, Weisman MH, eds. Rheumatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland:
Mosby; 2003;1877-1890. |
| 3. Mitchell DG, Rao VM, Dalinka MK, et al. Femoral head avascular
necrosis: correlation of MR imaging, radiographic staging, radionuclide imaging,
and clinical findings. Radiology. 1987;162:709-715. |
| 4. Wilson AJ, Murphy WA, Hardy DC, Totty WG. Transient osteoporosis:
transient bone marrow edema? Radiology. 1988;167:757-760. |
| 5. Bloem JL. Transient osteoporosis of the hip: MR imaging. Radiology.
1988;167:753-755. |
| 6. Harrington S, Smith J, Thompson J, Laskowski E. Idiopathic transient
osteoporosis: a hidden cause of hip pain. Phys Sportsmed. 2000;28:82-84, 8791,95-96. |
| 7. Christmas C, Crespo CJ, Franckowiak SC, Bathon JM, Bartlett
SJ, Andersen RE. How common is hip pain among older adults? results from the Third
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Fam Pract. 2002; 51:345-348. |
| 8. Curtiss PH Jr, Kincaid WE. Transitory demineralization of the
hip in pregnancy: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41:1327-1333. |
| 9. Lequesne M. Transient osteoporosis of the hip: a nontraumatic
variety of Sudeck's atrophy. Ann Rheum Dis. 1968;27:463-471. |
| 10. Lakhanpal S, Ginsburg WW, LuthraHS, Hunder GG. Transient regional
osteoporosis: a study of 56 cases and review of the literature. Ann Intern Med.
1987;106:444-450. |
| 11. Schapira D. Transient osteoporosis of the hip. Semin Arthritis
Rheum. 1992;22:98-105. |
| 12. Guerra JJ, Steinberg ME. Distinguishing transient osteoporosis
from avascular necrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:616-624. |
| 13. Hofmann S, Engel A, Neuhold A, Leder K, Kramer J, Plenk H Jr.
Bonemarrow oedema syndrome and transient osteoporosis of the hip: an MRIcontrolled
study of treatment by core decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:210-216. |
| 14. Plenk H Jr, Hofmann S, Eschberger J, et al. Histomorphology
and bone morphometry of the bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 1997;334:73-84. |
| 15. Parker RK, Ross GJ, Urso JA. Transient osteoporosis of the
knee. Skeletal Radial. 1997;26:306-309. |
|
16. McAlindon TE, Ward SA, MacFarlane D, Mathews JA. Transient
regional osteoporosis presenting as a septic arthritis. Postgrad Med J. 1993;69:
871-873. |
| 17. Lechevalier D, Eulry F, Crozes P, Pattin S. In situ migratory
algodystrophies of the knee: value of modern imaging [in French]. Rev Rhum Mal
Osteoartic. 1992;59:29-33. |
| 18. Duncan H, Frame B, Frost HM, Arnstein AR. Migratory osteolysis
of the lower extremities. Ann Intern Med. 1967;66:1165-1173. |
| 19. Glockner JF, Sundaram M, Pierron RL. Radiologic case study:
transient migratory osteoporosis of the hip and knee. Orthopedics. 1998;21:600,
594, 595. |
| 20. Banas MP, Kaplan FS, Fallon MD, Haddad JG. Regional migratory
osteoporosis: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
1990;250:303-309. |
| 21. Dunstan CR, Evans RA, Somers NM. Bone death in transient regional
osteoporosis. Bone. 1992;13:161-165. |
|
22. Steinberg ME, Brighton CT, Steinberg DR, Tooze SE, Hayken GD.
Treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head by a combination of bone grafting,
decompression, and electrical stimulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:137-153. |
| 23. Hayes CW, Conway WF, Daniel WW. MR imaging of bone marrow edema
pattern: transient osteoporosis, transient bone marrow edema syndrome, or osteonecrosis.
Radiographies. 1993;13:1001-1011. |
|
24. Daniel WW, Sanders PC, Alarcon GS. The early diagnosis of transient
osteoporosis by magnetic resonance imaging: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1992;74:1262-1264. |
| 25. Hofmann S. Bone-marrow oedema in transient osteoporosis, reflex
sympathetic dystrophy and osteonecrosis. In: Jacob RP, Fulford P, Horan F, eds.
European Instructional Course Lectures. Vol 4. London, England: British Editorial
Society of Bone and Joint Surgery; 1999;138-151. |
|
26. Hofmann S, Kramer J, Plenk H.Kneeland JB. Imaging of osteonecrosis.
In: Urbaniak JR, Jones JP Jr, eds. Osteonecrosis: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
Rosemont, 111: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1997;213-223. |
| 27. Samdani A, Lachmann E, Nagler W. Transient osteoporosis of
the hip during pregnancy: a case report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77:153-156. |
|
[Author Affiliation] |
| MATTHEW W. MARTINEZ, MD,*AND MATTHEW R. THOMAS, MD[dagger] |
|
[Author Affiliation] |
| *Resident in Internal Medicine, Mayo Graduate School of Medicine,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn. |
|
[dagger]Adviser to resident and Consultant in Primary Care Internal
Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn. |
| Individual reprints of this article are not available. Address
correspondence to Matthew R. Thomas, MD, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (e-mail:
thomas.matthew@mayo.edu). |
| © 2005 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research |